Jay Peterson
  • Home
  • Acting
    • Headshots
    • Resume
    • Press
    • History
    • Reels
  • The Gruntverse
    • Three briefings before a crisis
    • The Preliminary Report of Marshal Bennett
    • So your kid turned out to be a mage
  • Jay at Play
    • Nonfiction
    • Other videos >
      • Just Blanks
      • Tommy That
      • Machine Gun Shakespeare
      • Igor
  • Blog

I've been asked for my commentary on the Standing Rock protests.

12/1/2016

0 Comments

 
... I knew there was a reason I didn't officially quit drinking.
There's three parts to this:
First, my thoughts on the protest as a whole.
Second, on police response.
Third, the Walinsky incident, which is the one place where my expertise is warranted.
This is one of those things where I don't have any deep insight into the overall picture. I'm not an expert in First nation affairs, a geologist, a geographer, a petrochemical engineer, or even a roughneck. I'm a gunslinger and a tactician. Those are my wheelhouse.
That said, I do have a fondness for primary sources and people who track them down. And so far, the winner to come across my feed has been a gentleman by the name of Scott Gates. I don't know him personally, but he's put together a large and cited-to-hell-and-back note detailing the background of the pipeline and the protest in general.
(link to the note is in the first comment).
After tracing about half of his primary sources and finding them legit, I've been convinced that:
One, the pipeline is the currently known best alternative out of the options available.
Two, the actual threat to the water supply of Standing Rock is far, far less than claimed.
Three, While protesters have the right to object, they definitely don't have the right to block further work.
(As a side note, I will point out that Standing Rock has grown to a point where it's impossible to tell how many are members of standing rock and allied tribes, how many are miscellaneous hippies who needed something to do and missed OWS, how many are molotov cocktail-throwing anarchists, and how many are feds waiting to testify later.)
Which leads to part 2.
I've watched a good two hours of footage from police encounters from the protest camp. And what I'm seeing is more or less what I would have done: police occupying the bridges on 1806 where it crosses the cannonball river and heads north to where the pipeline is being constructed. Now that it's winter, it's the only effective way protesters could use to interfere with the pipeline. So the police have set up roadblocks marked with barbed wire barricades, and using less-lethal munitions on anyone who gets too close to the barricades.
This means the police are spending an overwhelming amount of their time in the defense. They're not raiding the protest camp (at least not on any large scale I know of). Those who are getting hit with munitions are those getting too close for the barricades.
For those objecting to that, I will point something out.
It's called crowd control.
Not crowd accommodate nor crowd tolerate nor crowd witness. Crowd control.
And while your average crowd may be full of incredibly bright individuals, collectively, a crowd is about as dense as your average mule and relatively as stubborn. Which means SOP is to use small, simple words in loud voices to tell them what to do. If words don't work, smacking them until they go in the opposite direction of the pain usually does.
Which leads me to part three.
Two weeks ago, a protester named Sophia Wilansky was badly injured, leaving her arm mangled and possibly needing amputation. According to statements by her father and other protesters, police threw a concussion grenade which hit her in the arm and exploded.
Google it if you feel like seeing for yourself. The wound has a large section of the skin on the inside of her arm gone, maybe 3"x10", with compound fractures to the radius and ulna, with a lot of accompanying soft tissue damage.
The problem with her story?
Absolutely nothing in the U.S. police forces arsenal that I know about leaves that kind of wound.
Protesters insist it was a concussion grenade (which to my knowledge, doesn't exist. At least not by that name). Assuming for the moment they mean a flashbang, that makes no sense. Flashbangs neither produce shrapnel that can cause the loss of flesh nor have the force to break bones. Flashbangs can and do cause severe burns, but there's no burns on her. No blisters, no charred flesh, no burns, charring, or melting to her clothing.
Everything else the cops use: foam, bean bags, rubber bullets, they all don't have the force to cause her wounds. They hurt and leave heavy bruises, but not compound fractures.
Morton county police claim that someone rolled metal cylinders on the ground just before an explosion, and soon after a woman was carried off by other protesters. Propane gas cylinders were recovered by cops at the scene.
Depending on how it was made, an IED using a propane tank as it's motive force could have caused both the breaks and the torn skin.
Another possibility centers around the activity for the night: several protesters were trying to remove obstacles, including dead vehicles, from the road. A tow chain that snapped under tension is very capable of making the kind of wound seen on Wilansky.
So, there you have it. Whatever maimed her, it wasn't from a police arsenal.
And I really, really hope it was a tow chain.
Because if we've gotten to the point where some people think setting IED's at a protest is a legit tactic, it's going to get real nasty real quick.
Hug your loved ones and spare a little time to listen to your enemies, folks.
0 Comments



Leave a Reply.

    Picture

    Jay Peterson

    Musings on violence, storytelling, and humanity in general.

    Archives

    December 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    June 2013
    April 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    April 2012
    February 2012
    February 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    August 2010
    June 2010
    August 2008

    Categories

    All
    2nd Amendment
    Archer
    Armor
    Barbarism
    Blades
    Blanks
    Boobplate
    Book Review
    Chainmail Bikini
    Fight Scene
    Film
    Firearms
    History
    Killology
    Military
    Reality
    Safety
    Set Life
    Shakespeare
    Teacupping
    Theater
    Tucker Thayer
    USMC
    Viking
    War Stories
    Weapon Of The Week
    Workshops
    Wounds

    RSS Feed

Certa Bonum Certamen

Picture