Jay Peterson
  • Home
  • Acting
    • Headshots
    • Resume
    • Press >
      • C3 Tweets
    • History
    • Reels
  • The Gruntverse
    • Three briefings before a crisis
    • The Preliminary Report of Marshal Bennett
    • So your kid turned out to be a mage
  • Jay at Play
    • Nonfiction
    • Other videos >
      • Just Blanks
      • Tommy That
      • Machine Gun Shakespeare
      • Igor
  • Blog

Getting around

6/29/2014

0 Comments

 
Busy, busy, busy over here at the Labs. Among other things, I've been doing a lot of knife throwing lately. Yesterday the Lady had a party, several guests of which tried their hand at it. Most did pretty good.
The above is an intermediate stage of something I've been working on, punctuated by what a friend calls "The Barbarian Voila." I like it.
Picture
In other news, I'm teaching a one-day Sword & Shield for Film seminar focusing on Viking styles. It'll be down at the production centre at Pinewood Studios Atlanta. Follow the directions on the pic to learn more.

On top of that, I'm about to pack some knives, shirts, and other fun to head down to vend at the National Stage Combat Workshop in NC. I've been twice as a student and a handful of times as a vendor. If you're into fighting for an audience, it's three weeks of some of the best training possible.
0 Comments

That guy

6/9/2014

0 Comments

 
Last time I talked about the UCSB murders, it focused on being Schrodinger's rapist, and the effect that has on life, and how much it's becoming a fact of life for more and more people.
But the more I've thought about it, the more I realize I also could fall into another category. This particular one I've seen from both the inside and outside. Almost universally disliked by every awkward male to ever walk the earth. And while the UCSB scumbag's main target of scorn and violence was women in general, number two on his shit list was this particular well-known specimen. He is known by many names and types, but his nature is always the same.
He is The Guy Who's Getting Laid When You Are Not.
Just about everyone male who read this recognized him once I spoke of his nature. Oh Him? Fuuuuuck that guy. What a prick.
Maybe he's not the recipient of outright hate. Sometimes it's just frustration. Envy. And just head-shaking incredulity.
And yeah, I've encountered That Guy in my younger days, and had the low-level grumbly reactions. I like to think I've handled such encounters better than most, but nostalgia and wishful thinking may be clouding memory.
And about once a year it is pointed out to me that I am That Guy.
It's almost always at an event of some sort, and following some sort of Attack-Harem-related shenaniganry. I get pulled aside by a gent and asked a variation of "How did you just wind up with both the attention and affection of multiple ladies just now?"
The questioners run the gamut. Some are clearly really asking, "I do not speak the language of these strange but irresistibly nice-smelling, curvy people. Please help me to not embarrass myself while I pursue further discourse."
Others are inquiring more on the lines of "Dude! I don't know what sort of sorcerous panty-dropping app you have on your phone but I NEED it! Tell me!"
I've done my best to answer somewhat helpfully in the past.
But seeing the mindset of the UCSB killer, I'm both glad I took the time and wish I said more. Because for every one that did actually ASK, how many just watched and let the bitter and the hatred grow a touch more?
The big things I think I'd mention if asked today...
- Nobody you've seen me with owes me squat.
Not their presence, not their affections, period. They are there because they want to be. That's it.
- Appreciation, not objectification
I'll admit this one is hard to define or analyze. It's also damn near impossible to fake.
No gents, you don't have to avert your gaze if an acquaintance is cleaning up good. But we do look at objects that draw the eye differently than we do people that do the same, and looking at the latter like the former doesn't go over well.
- Fuckups happen. Own them and move on.
Every time I've been pulled aside and furtively questioned, it's followed some sort of weapons-grade flirtation on my part. And the questioner is almost invariably comparing the equivalent of my highlight reel to their own stumblethrough rehearsal.
I'll be the first to admit: I've fucked up. A lot. Whether it's approaching the uninterested to dodging hits with a clue-by-four all the way up to being granted citizenship in the country of Assholeistan, population: me.
As the years roll by I fuck up less and either atone or withdraw in classier fashion, but a good chunk of that is a hard road of experience (and in a lot of cases, observation. Learning from other people's fuckups is easier on your own mileage).
- I haven't had sex with nearly as many of them as you think
Not only that, I'm not even sleeping with the vast majority.
(Wait for it. Remember I speak in literal terms... and the lightbulb goes off.)
There's no real delicate way to make a euphemism for that one. We unfortunately live in a society that declares "being physically close/visibly affectionate = sexual relationship."
And in my case, at least, that's bullshit. The term "Attack Harem" is a joke collective name for various friends of mine who happen to be both ladies and a tad overprotective. (One threatened to invade Iraq personally if anything happened to me).
Yeah, I'm affectionate, yeah, I'm flirtatious. I'm also big believers in
A ) everyone setting their own personal limits and respecting those of others, and
B ) living my life without the bullshit notion that intimacy and sensuality are impossible to have and enjoy outside of sex.
As far as those I really am whatever and how? Nobody's business but mine, theirs, and any applicable significant others. That alone is worthy reason. Add in my inherent defense of other people's secrets and the bullshit societal double standard that always, always comes down harder on ladies in such arrangements, and it all adds up to that's all you're getting out of me.
So there you have it. Long, confusing in spots, and brings more questions than answers.
Still, I can hope it spreads more thought than hate.
0 Comments

Get a Grip! Defending teacupping

6/4/2014

2 Comments

 
Yep. You read that right.
I'm justifying teacupping.
Hell, I've done so once in a private class and once on a gig in the past month, I might as well keep at it.

For those who don't know what I'm talking about, "teacupping" is a derogatory term used for a certain way of gripping a handgun that's currently out of favor.

In fact, nowadays I'd have to say in the top ten of "things to make your firearm advisor happy on set," "not teacupping" might rank just below "calling it a magazine, not a clip," and "not flagging me."


So, what is it? What makes it a bad thing? (if it even is a bad thing?) Why the bad rap?

History lesson time.

For the bulk of its existence, the pistol was a one-handed weapon. Once technology could scale down from the "handgonnes" of earlier times, the pistol became a favored backup weapon alongside the saber and cutlass, not to mention reins or rigging. Until WWI, U.S. Army holsters were designed to cross-draw, reflecting a right-handed officer's instinct to use the sword with the right hand and pistol with the left.  


Picture
Bad cellphone pic. Decent one-handed grip.
Here and there, two-handed grips were used for whatever reason, but on an ad hoc basis. It's my personal belief that the first use of a two-handed grip was what we now call The Teacup.
Picture
BEHOLD! TEACUPPING IN ALL ITS WICKED GLORY!!!!!!
This grip is almost invariably the first two-handed grip that an untrained shooter uses.

The reason is simple. With the pistol operable with one hand, the other is relegated to a support role. The most immediately needed support to a new shooter the vast majority of the time isn't against recoil, but against weight. Pistols are heavy, so the support hand naturally rests under the butt to take some of the weight off of the shooting hand.

Looking at it this way, teacupping is the untrained, but natural and instinctive response to having to hold a pistol two-handed.

It felt so natural the U.S. Army was recommending it in WWII.

(Teacupping ensues at 5:20)
So, if teacupping is a natural and instinctive response, what's the big deal?

Well, the major sin of teacupping these days is inefficiency at worst. When actually shooting, the support hand offers no support against the force of the shot (what with coming from the wrong direction and all), leaving the shooting arm to absorb the recoil.

There's a couple different ways to be more efficient. Jack Weaver took a teacup and turned it into a sort of piston grip by having the support hand pull back while the shooting hand pushed forward. This helped get the pistol back on target after the force of the shot lifted the muzzle up.

The most popular grip these days, however, seems to be a wraparound of one kind or another.

Picture
Wrapped
In this particular case, the support hand comes up on the side, fingers sliding into the grooves left on the grip by the fingers of the shooting hand. The shooting hand's thumb curls down and forward, paralleling the thumb of the support hand.

(Hint: if you ever hear gun enthusiasts yell "thumbs forward!" while watching an action scene, this is what they're talking about.)

What this grip ends up doing is keeping the grip balanced between both hands, giving the shooter the strength of both arms (and in some instances, the torso) to alleviate the effects of recoil.

That's pretty much it.

So, why teacup in a gunfighting scene if you know that?

Any number of reasons: an untrained character, a period piece (wraparound grips didn't become popular until the great pistol technique argument was kicked off by folks like Cooper, Weaver, and Chapman in the late 50's-early 60's), character fatigue or injury (where a steady shot is more important than recovery for follow-up shots), or any number of other reasons.

I can recognize the teacup isn't the best grip out there. But it's there for a reason. And knowing why and how lets me and my performers come to a more informed choice, and ultimately, a more nuanced story.

~J.
2 Comments
    Picture

    Jay Peterson

    Musings on violence, storytelling, and humanity in general.

    Archives

    March 2023
    February 2023
    December 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019
    June 2019
    May 2019
    April 2019
    March 2019
    February 2019
    January 2019
    December 2018
    November 2018
    October 2018
    September 2018
    August 2018
    June 2018
    May 2018
    April 2018
    March 2018
    February 2018
    January 2018
    December 2017
    November 2017
    October 2017
    September 2017
    August 2017
    July 2017
    June 2017
    May 2017
    April 2017
    March 2017
    February 2017
    January 2017
    December 2016
    November 2016
    October 2016
    September 2016
    August 2016
    July 2016
    June 2016
    May 2016
    April 2016
    March 2016
    February 2016
    January 2016
    December 2015
    November 2015
    October 2015
    September 2015
    August 2015
    July 2015
    June 2015
    May 2015
    March 2015
    February 2015
    January 2015
    December 2014
    November 2014
    October 2014
    September 2014
    August 2014
    July 2014
    June 2014
    May 2014
    April 2014
    March 2014
    January 2014
    December 2013
    November 2013
    October 2013
    September 2013
    June 2013
    April 2013
    December 2012
    November 2012
    October 2012
    September 2012
    April 2012
    February 2012
    February 2011
    December 2010
    November 2010
    August 2010
    June 2010
    August 2008

    Categories

    All
    2nd Amendment
    Archer
    Armor
    Barbarism
    Blades
    Blanks
    Boobplate
    Book Review
    Chainmail Bikini
    Fight Scene
    Film
    Firearms
    History
    Killology
    Military
    Reality
    Safety
    Set Life
    Shakespeare
    Teacupping
    Theater
    Tucker Thayer
    USMC
    Viking
    War Stories
    Weapon Of The Week
    Workshops
    Wounds

    RSS Feed

Certa Bonum Certamen

Picture